Laser position capture on the GURU simulator while the cyclist pedals

Summary

BIKEFIT 3D · GURU

In the laboratory · Usaquén, Bogotá

A position study on a simulator that changes geometry while you keep pedalling, so two positions can be compared in seconds without getting off the bike.

How long it takes
Two to three hours, in the lab. The time varies with the complexity of the case and the changes that have to be transferred to your bike.
What you leave with

Your starting and final coordinates documented in millimetres, not just a bike that was moved.

The changes transferred to your own bike and checked under load before you leave.

A final report and follow-up through the adaptation weeks.

What it costs
from COP 595,000approx. USD 190

What it does not do

A bike fit does not cure an injury and does not replace a clinical diagnosis. If pain does not respond to position, the next step is a health professional.

5.0 on Google from 60 public reviews, verifiable on the laboratory listing.

BIKEFIT 3D · GURU

BIKEFIT 3D in Bogotá with GURU technology

You move when you pedal. Your assessment should too.

Compare position adjustments while you keep pedalling under load. GURU simulation connects measurement with the position you ride on your own bike.

Two decades of applied cycling science.

What it costs and what it includes.

We publish the figure because comparing blind is what leads to paying twice. A one-hour adjustment and a study that integrates anthropometry, dynamometry, 3D motion capture and follow-up are not the same price because they are not the same thing. With the number in front of you, you can compare scope instead of just cost.

ONE 3D Performance Lab room with the GURU simulator and a cyclist pedalling during a study

Investment

from COP 595,000approx. USD 190

One session of 2 to 3 hours, in person at the Usaquén laboratory.

  • Body and strength assessment.
  • 3D pedalling analysis and GURU position testing.
  • Transfer to your bike and final coordinates.
  • Report and adaptation follow-up.
View technical scope
  • ISAK Level 2 anthropometry: segment lengths, breadths and skinfolds measured to international protocol.
  • Isometric dynamometry with VALD DynaMo Plus: strength and range of motion per side, with asymmetry quantified.
  • 3D motion capture of your pedalling under load on the GURU Ultimate 3D simulator.
  • Real-time configuration testing and transfer to your own bike.
  • Report with the final coordinates, the starting ones and the reason for every change.
  • Follow-up through the post-study adaptation period.

The «from» reflects scope: reviewing an already validated position is not the same work as rebuilding one with a documented asymmetry. Anything that applies to your case is explained before booking, never after.

Request BIKEFIT 3D
Cyclist pedalling on the GURU Dynamic Fit Unit while the position is adjusted on the move

In-lab BIKEFIT

Adjustment observed while you pedal.

Dynamic capture links movement, load and position while changes are made on the move. Each adjustment can then be documented and transferred to the rider's real bicycle.

Format
On-site in the laboratory
Estimated duration
2 to 3 hours
Deliverable
Complete biomechanical report

The process, step by step

Not a static fit. A progressive biomechanical decision.

01

Assess the cyclist.

02

Simulate position.

03

Adjust while riding under load.

04

Validate response.

05

Transfer to the real bike.

What you take home

The report: every coordinate, before and after, and why it moved.

This is the format of the document you receive at the end of the study. Each change comes with the starting value, the final value and the reason, so any workshop can reproduce it and you can check it a year from now.

BIKEFIT 3D reportRoad · endurance bike · lower-back discomfort after the second hourFormat sample · the figures are illustrative and do not belong to any rider
Saddle height742 mm748 mmUnder load, the knee did not reach the extension it showed in the static test. The saddle went up and MOCAP confirmed the pelvis did not start rocking.
Saddle-to-bar reach548 mm536 mmTo reach the hoods, the pelvis rotated forward and the lower back took the rest. A stem 10 mm shorter, tested on the GURU before changing the part.
Crank length172.5 mm170 mm165, 170 and 172.5 mm were compared pedalling on the simulator. At 170 mm the hip closed less at the top of the stroke and power did not drop.
Right cleat · rotation0°2° heel inThe laser showed the right knee drifting out on the downstroke and the left one not. Only that side was corrected.

Validation

The final coordinates are transferred to your bike and checked with an orthogonal capture while you pedal again.

Components

Stem, spacers, cranks and saddle worth changing, and the ones that were tested and ruled out.

Adaptation

How to return to training in the new position, and which discomfort is adaptation and which needs a review.

BIKEFIT IN DETAIL

Position changes on the move. Measurement does too.

We observe the cyclist as a system: posture, contact points, cleats and response to each adjustment while pedaling continues. The process moves from dynamic measurement and laser references to a final test on your own bicycle.

Precision BIKEFIT 3D

A poor position does not always hurt immediately.

It can appear as power loss, early fatigue, numbness, instability or the inability to hold an efficient posture. The goal is not to copy an ideal position; it is to find a position compatible with you.

What we assess

  • Current position and contact points.
  • Mobility and functional restrictions.
  • Force and asymmetries through dynamometry when relevant.
  • ISAK anthropometry when relevant.
  • Pedaling, stability, saddle, cockpit and cleat support.
  • Relationship between comfort, efficiency and performance.

Measuring the body before the bike

Anthropometry and dynamometry, integrated.

A position is fitted to a specific body, and a specific body has lengths, ranges and forces that are not the same on both sides. Measuring that before touching the bike is what separates a study from an adjustment: without those numbers, any asymmetry that shows up in the pedal stroke is read by eye.

Both are measured with protocol and with instruments, not with a tape measure and judgement. Anthropometry follows the ISAK standard, at Level 2 accreditation. Strength and range are measured with a VALD DynaMo Plus.

Skinfold measurement with a caliper on a cyclist's back, following ISAK protocol

ISAK Level 2 anthropometry

  • Segment lengths per side: femur, tibia and foot. This is what explains why two riders with the same inseam need different saddle heights.
  • Bone breadths and girths: biacromial and bi-iliocristal widths drive handlebar and saddle choice.
  • Skinfolds to protocol: recorded as a sum, not converted into a body-fat percentage that would carry the equation's error.
  • Measured repeatability: the ISAK standard requires a technical error of measurement within limits, which is what makes two sessions months apart comparable.

Dynamometry · VALD DynaMo Plus

  • Isometric strength and range in one instrument: dynamometer and inclinometer combined, so force and mobility are recorded in the same test rather than across two sessions.
  • Over 400 test protocols with five interchangeable attachments, covering hip, knee, ankle, trunk and shoulder.
  • Asymmetry in numbers, not impressions: each side is measured separately and the difference calculated. A 12 % imbalance between legs is actionable; «your right looks stronger» is not.
  • Comparable over time: the same battery repeated after a block of work tells you whether the imbalance was corrected or merely compensated.

Externally anchored tests are prioritised over manually resisted ones: it is the configuration with the best documented reliability, and the only one that lets a measurement taken today be compared with one taken six months from now.

What this changes in practice: a strength difference between legs changes what has to be looked at. If the right leg produces 15 % less on the isometric test, raising the saddle «until both legs reach evenly» fixes the appearance, not the origin. What the measurement gives is a documented starting point: we check that the difference repeats across attempts, contrast it with symptoms and with what pedalling shows, and from there decide whether it calls for a change of position, strength work or a clinical assessment. A difference in isometric strength is not a power split, and on its own it does not prescribe a per-side adjustment.

Contact points

Saddle, front end and cranks, one at a time.

The three places where your body meets the bike are tested while you keep pedalling on the simulator. Pick the one you want to see.

[ 01 · Saddle ]

Shape, width and support are decided with the pelvis loaded and pedalling, not from a catalogue.

A lattice that yields where it should
Variable-density padding
Additive manufacturing
Support that holds over the hours

[ 02 · Bar and stem ]

Reach, drop and width decide how much weight the hands carry and how the shoulders and neck breathe.

Where the hands load the bar

[ 03 · Cranks ]

Crank length changes the circle the knee and hip draw on every pedal stroke.

The pedal circle, out on the road

SADDLE AND PRESSURE POINTS

The contact point is assessed, not assumed.

The saddle carries most of your weight and is where discomfort shows up first. Sit-bone spacing is measured directly during the assessment, using a laser reference, and combined with your pelvic position, mobility and pedal stroke. From there the support is checked under load: whether the pelvis stays level, whether it rocks as the hours add up, and whether the pressure sits on bone or on soft tissue.

Width: support for your anatomy
Sit-bone spacing helps guide support width. More width is not automatically better: we also check thigh clearance and pelvic position.
Curvature: freedom or a defined seat
A flatter profile allows more changes of position; a waved profile offers a more defined support area. We compare both according to how you sit and move, rather than assigning one by riding discipline alone.

The top view illustrates outline and width, not the side curvature or a measured pressure map. Saddle shape guide

Comfort, control and performance start at the contact point.

Where the pressure actually sits

  • The sit bones are what should carry the load. Their spacing is measured, not estimated from height or from the size of the frame.
  • Everything forward of them is soft tissue. Numbness, burning or pain that appears after an hour is usually load that moved off the bone and onto tissue that cannot carry it.
  • Pelvic rotation moves the support point. A saddle that works upright can load somewhere else entirely once the torso drops, which is why it is checked in the position actually ridden.
  • It is assessed under load and over time on the simulator: pelvic stability, rocking and how the support behaves as fatigue builds, not in a ten-second still.

What this is not: ONE does not use an instrumented pressure mat. The assessment combines direct sit-bone measurement, 3D capture of pelvic stability and your reported symptoms. Saying so is part of the method — a pressure map measures something this does not, and we do not claim it.

CONTACT MAP

Illustrative geometries
Saddle geometry comparisonIllustrative saddle profiles. Choose a geometry to compare its shape and width.
01Shape
02Width
03Support
[ Pressure map ]Pelvic rotation moves the support point

Reference footage from saddle manufacturers. It illustrates concepts; it is not an ONE measurement.

Comparative saddle selection

fizik Adaptive saddles: compare them while riding before deciding.

The saddle changes effective height, setback and how the pelvis is supported and rotates. That is why it should not be chosen from a catalogue alone: the lab keeps a selection of fizik Adaptive saddles available to fit and ride during the study. Measurement guides the width; dynamic comparison determines shape and support in your actual riding position.

The Adaptive range uses 3D-printed padding made by Carbon through Digital Light Synthesis (DLS). Its lattice integrates multiple functional zones, each tuned separately to provide different cushioning and mechanical responses for the riding discipline, body position and bicycle geometry.

If one of the options is suitable, it is fitted and adjusted in the same session with saddle height and setback recalculated. A different saddle changes effective height; keeping the previous coordinates without measuring again can undermine a good choice.

What gets tested

  • Argo family · short nose. A stable platform that accommodates greater pelvic rotation and more forward or aerodynamic riding positions.
  • Antares family · low profile. Its tapered nose-to-wing transition supports fore-aft movement and efficient pedalling across different positions.
  • 140 and 150 mm widths, to combine sit-bone distance with riding position and pressure distribution while pedalling.
  • R1 and R3 constructions, with different rails and weights within the same shape: support comes first, construction level second.

Testing does not commit you to buying. If your current saddle is the right one, you leave knowing it — which is also a result.

Public reviews on Google

What cyclists say after their BIKEFIT.

See all reviews

Understand and test every adjustment

“the patience to explain each adjustment and test it on the trainer until the position really works.”

Camilo

BIKEFIT

Excerpt translated from a public review.

BIKEFIT

“This is not a superficial fitting.”

María Alejandra Sánchez

BIKEFIT

Excerpt translated from a public review.

BIKEFIT

“The result exceeded my expectations.”

Germán Sáenz

BIKEFIT

Excerpt translated from a public review.

BIKEFIT

“Power transfer felt much better.”

Pablo Enrique Agámez Cepeda

BIKEFIT

Excerpt translated from a public review.

BIKEFIT

“Professional, meticulous and highly knowledgeable.”

Andrea Amaris

BIKEFIT

Excerpt translated from a public review.

Selected excerpts from public reviews. Individual experiences; read the full context on Google.

Frequently asked questions

Questions before booking a bike fit.

What is a bike fit or cycling biomechanical assessment?

An assessment of the rider and their position, so the bike can be adjusted to their anatomy, mobility, discipline and goal. At ONE the analysis is dynamic: changes are made and validated while you pedal under load, not with the bike standing still.

Can a bike fit help with knee pain?

It can help when the pain is related to position, cleat placement, saddle height or how load is distributed while pedalling. The assessment compares possible causes under load instead of assuming every painful knee needs the same adjustment. Pain linked to injury or another clinical condition requires the appropriate healthcare professional.

Can a bike fit help with numb hands?

Yes, when the numbness is related to reach, handlebar drop, wrist position, pressure distribution or the way the pelvis is supported. Those variables are tested together while you pedal. Persistent or unexplained numbness should also be assessed by the appropriate healthcare professional.

What makes the GURU Ultimate 3D different from a regular fit?

It changes the geometry while you keep pedalling. In a conventional fit every change means stopping, swapping a component and climbing back on, by which point the sensation you were meant to compare has faded. The motorised unit — the DFU, or Dynamic Fit Unit — moves saddle and handlebar under load, so two positions can be compared back to back rather than from memory.

Which measurements are adjusted?

Depending on the case: saddle height and setback, handlebar reach and height, cleat position, foot support, saddle width and any component that constrains the position. The final coordinates are recorded in stack and reach, which are independent of brand and model and can be reproduced on any bicycle.

Does it work for road, MTB, gravel or triathlon?

Yes. The target ranges change with the discipline — more clearance to manoeuvre on MTB, the balance between aerodynamics and sustainable power on triathlon and time trial — but the principles of contact, stability and force transfer are the same. If you have not bought the bike yet, the right order is the reverse: pre-purchase study first, fit afterwards.

How long does the session take, and what should I bring?

Usually two to three hours, including physical assessment, dynamic exploration and transferring the coordinates to your bike. Bring the bicycle as you actually ride it, with your usual pedals and saddle, and the kit and shoes you normally use. Any relevant history helps too: medical or physiotherapy reports, a previous fit, and the discomfort you want solved — including at what point in the ride it appears.

How much does a BIKEFIT cost?

ONE BIKEFIT 3D is offered from COP 595,000 (approx. USD 190). It includes the physical assessment, ISAK Level 2 anthropometry, VALD DynaMo Plus dynamometry, 3D motion capture under load, configuration testing on GURU, transfer to your own bicycle, the report and follow-up. The final scope is agreed before booking.

Can I train normally afterwards?

Yes, though it is worth returning progressively. A change of position redistributes load and the body needs a few rides to adapt, so an unfamiliar sensation at first does not necessarily mean the adjustment is wrong. A follow-up is included when the case calls for it.

Where is the laboratory and does the fit work for visitors?

The lab is in Usaquén, Bogotá, at 2,600 m. Cyclists from Europe, Central America and the United States have travelled to be assessed here. The session is on-site because the simulator, dynamometry and anthropometry cannot be done remotely; the resulting coordinates travel with you and apply to any bike you own.

Precision to ride better.

Your position should not force you to compensate. BIKEFIT 3D with GURU technology helps improve the relationship between body, bike, comfort and performance under load.

Credentials · Scientific direction

Who decides what moves on your bike, and with what training.

As Scientific Director and Head Coach across multiple teams, he integrates real-time GURU biomechanics, dynamometry for strength and range of motion, MOCAP 3D, ISAK Level 2 anthropometry, sports nutrition (ISSN), power, data science and biostatistics to improve measurement precision, support professional decisions and validate the athlete’s response.

Measuring precisely is not promising certainty. It is being able to repeat the measurement and compare.

Athletes supported by ONE have earned regional, national and Pan American medals and competed at World Championships.
More than 3,000 bike fit and biomechanical assessment processes carried out over the years, with different instruments and stages of the laboratory: not all of them used GURU, 3D capture or the current equipment.
Force is measured with the dynamometer anchored to a fixed point, because a hand-held test stops being comparable between sessions.
Twenty years coaching cyclists, from five-hour-a-week amateurs to riders at world championships.

The method behind the assessment

The method behind the assessment · 6 primary sourcesView the full citationsBini et al. 2011 · Ferrer-Roca et al. 2012 · Fonda et al. 2014 · Silberman et al. 2005 · Collings et al. 2025 · Potter et al. 2008

The sources behind the measurement protocol and the adjustment criteria used during the session.

  1. Bini, R., Hume, P. A. and Croft, J. L. (2011). Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance. Sports Medicine.
  2. Ferrer-Roca, V., Roig, A., Galilea, P. and García-López, J. (2012). Influence of saddle height on lower limb kinematics in well-trained cyclists. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.
  3. Fonda, B., Sarabon, N. and Li, F. X. (2014). Validity and reliability of different kinematics methods used for bike fitting. Journal of Sports Sciences.
  4. Silberman, M. R., Webner, D., Collina, S. and Shiple, B. J. (2005). Road bicycle fit. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine.
  5. Collings, T. J. et al. (2025). Reliability of VALD DynaMo dynamometer to assess upper and lower body isometric strength in healthy adults. Physical Therapy in Sport.
  6. Potter, J. J., Sauer, J. L., Weisshaar, C. L., Thelen, D. G. and Ploeg, H. L. (2008). Gender differences in bicycle saddle pressure distribution during seated cycling. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
ONEPERFORMANCE FINDER
Your next step starts here